18 October 2024

Review: Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe

Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe book cover

There are so many classics I still haven't read and thankfully my bookish buddy Veronica from The Burgeoning Bookshelf bravely agreed to tackle Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe with me recently. We were both reading the Penguin clothbound edition and when I encountered a sentence 21 lines long within the first six pages - and looking further ahead saw zero chapter breaks - I knew I was in for a challenging read.

Published more than 300 years ago in 1719, this review is going to contain plot developments so if you're precious about having the plot of Robinson Crusoe spoiled you should give this review a miss. This book is about Robinson Crusoe and his adventures after being shipwrecked on an island. We get a surprising amount of backstory before the eventual shipwrecking but we're told on the title page that Crusoe spends 28 years alone on an un-inhabited island so how's that for a 300 year old spoiler from the author?

As a character, I wasn't a fan of Crusoe at all and I found him selfish and self-serving. The novel contains much internal reflection and thoughts about God and purpose and you could argue it was a spiritual story of sorts, although lacking a conclusion.
"Upon the whole, here was an undoubted testimony, that there was scarce any condition in the world so miserable, but there was something negative or something positive to be thankful for in it; and let this stand as a direction from the experience of the most miserable of all conditions in this world, that we may always find in it something to comfort our selves from, and to set in the description of good and evil, on the credit side of the accompt." Page 54
Crusoe has a good attitude in this regard and the ability to see the silver lining is an important life lesson still being learned today. There's also a heavy focus on gratitude, as this quote attests:
"It put me upon reflecting, how little repining there would be among mankind, at any condition of life, if people would rather compare their condition with those that are worse, in order to be thankful, than be always comparing them with those which are better, to assist their murmurings and complainings." Page 132
Naturally we have many sayings to this effect (the grass is always greener, there's always someone worse off than you, a bird in the hand etc.) but 300 years ago, I wonder if this sentiment was as well known as it is today.

However, I was most entertained when Crusoe was being industrious on the island. Scavenging everything he could from the shipwreck, he sets up a camp with defences, plans out his rations, ingeniously cultivates food sources and builds and makes almost anything. In the time he was alone, he dries grapes for raisins each season, builds pens for wild goats, sows corn and barley, weaves baskets and makes clothes, furniture and more.

The scariest part of the book by far was when Crusoe saw a footprint in the sand that wasn't his own. He was terrified and for the next two years worked to increase his defences while continuing to monitor his surroundings in fear.

Eventually we learn the footprint belongs to visiting 'savages' as Crusoe calls them - and again the reader needs to remember this was written 300 years ago - and he witnesses them killing and eating human prisoners. Embarking on a plan to rescue a prisoner was a grand idea, until Crusoe shares his ultimate purpose is not for a companion but to make one his slave.
"Besides, I fancied myself able to manage one, nay, two or three savages, if I had them so as to make them entirely slaves to me, to do whatever I should direct them, and to prevent their being able at any time to do me any hurt." Page 158
I found this abhorrent and was grinding my teeth in anger when Crusoe succeeds. He calls his freed captive Friday - for the day he was rescued - which I found terribly insulting. With all of that religious reflection, why didn't he choose to call the man Providence, Faith or Adam? He teaches Friday english and tells him his name is Master (eye roll). Friday is grateful to Crusoe for saving his life and swears fealty - in effect - for life.

Other similar rescues occur after this point, including Friday's father. Their reunion was an emotional moment, but he and a Spaniard return to the mainland in a canoe to rescue fellow Spaniards and plan to return to Crusoe's island and share in the plentiful provisions. In that time, a mutinied ship arrives, a battle of weapons and wits takes place, and Crusoe becomes the captain of sorts.

Without any hesitation, Crusoe decides to leave the island for good, completely setting aside his previous plan with Friday's father. I was infuriated that Crusoe has no qualms abandoning his previous agreement, instead believing a letter will suffice. He also doesn't acknowledge any reluctance by Friday to leave the island before his father has returned, knowing they may never see each other again.

When Crusoe reaches society, there was plenty about his business dealings but I was interested to hear how Friday was adjusting to the culture shock. Crusoe goes on to have a family, but did Friday want to return home or have a family of his own?

Alas we never find out because the protagonist is too selfish to care, taking pains to provide for a loyal old woman from his earlier life as a young man yet completely dismissive of his year's long companion. There's also no reflecting on God after his 'salvation' either. He just goes back to business and his affairs, ugh!

Having finished it, I'm shocked Robinson Crusoe by Daniel Defoe has been recommended reading for children and students over the years. The internal reflections are dull and the cannibalism and murders make it way too violent for young readers. If the book started with his shipwreck and focussed purely on his labours, then it would be one hell of an adventure. Alas, we have this story instead and I didn't enjoy it.

Thanks to Veronica for the buddy read and the encouragement to get through this. It's now off my list, woohoo! (I'm publishing this review on a Friday in tribute to an exploited and overlooked character).

My Rating:


Would you like to comment?

  1. I have to say, I'm kind of very glad I didn't have time to join you in this read. I might even delete it from my kindle library. It's a shame it wasn't more enjoyable though. I wonder what other novels were published around the same time that have become classics that we would think we're awful. With the way they ban books these days, I'm surprised they haven't banned this one, but then it possibly speaks to their agenda.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Claire, not sure you would have enjoyed this, but I don't regret reading it and I'm glad I can finally have an opinion about it. Another classic I didn't enjoy was Frankenstein but again, I'm glad I've read both of these books because they keep coming up in general reference and now I'm informed enough to say I don't like Robinson Crusoe or Frankenstein! Even if that lands me in the minority 😉

      Delete
  2. Thanks for the buddy read Tracey. I certainly got a few laughs from the story. Defoe had a wonderful imagination.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Veronica, it was motivating for me knowing you were reading it at the same time, hope to do another one again some time!

      Delete
  3. Literally just finished it last night and have been thinking about it all morning.
    I'm with you all the way in that it was long and windy, not to mention extremely boring in parts. But I have to remind myself that it was probably a rollicking read when it was published, a wide-eyed audience entranced by this exotic tale of a far flung corner of the world.
    I did have a chuckle every time Crusoe constantly lamented his bad luck of being stranded upon this deserted island. It sounded pretty idyllic to me - my own private island with endless supplies of meat, fruit, fish, eggs and so on. I'd take that any day!
    Thanks for the review and enabling me to share my thoughts from Ireland on a chilly Thursday morning in December:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much for your comment Connor, it's funny how books can unite readers across the seas isn't it? I'm still shocked at how old this classic is and I was chuckling when it came to descriptions about his outfit. After I finished reading the book I had a look at some of the old film adaptations to see how they interpreted his goat skin ensemble! It pleases me no end to hear you were reading this in chilly Ireland and then stumbled on to this review. Readers know no barriers 😊 What classic are you going to tackle next year? I was thinking I might give The Count of Monte Cristo a try.

      Delete
  4. Hi Tracey, I'm starting to wonder if the word 'classic' is bandied about too much. I've tried and failed in the past year to get to the end of either Dracula or Moby Dick. And there are too many great books out there to be persevering with ones that are hard work.
    One that I revert back to time and again is Watership Down, probably my favourite book of all time.
    Right now I'm reading Poor by Katriona O'Sullivan. It's gritty, sad and relatable for someone like me who was raised on a council housing estate.
    As for The Count of Monte Cristo, I've seen the film and it was really good. I'll await your review before I tackle the literary version though:)
    Here's the link to Poor, if anyone is interested: https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/452168/poor-by-osullivan-katriona/9780241996768

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh yeah, I should have asked if you review books anywhere? On a blog or Good Reads etc? Would love to check out your thoughts on Watership Down.

      Delete
    2. Hi Tracey,

      I don't review books at all, in fact Carpe Librum was the first place I've ever left my thoughts on a novel. But I'll definitely keep an eye on your page as I'm always looking for something to read.

      Delete
    3. Thanks Conor and in that case I'm honoured that this is the first time you've commented on someone's review. Next year will be my 20th year reviewing books here on Carpe Librum so I'm stoked I was able to entice you into leaving one. I hope you manage to pick up a few new reads over the festive season!

      Delete
  5. Hi Tracey, I'm starting to wonder if the word 'classic' is bandied about too much. I've tried and failed in the past year to get to the end of either Dracula or Moby Dick. And there are too many great books out there to be persevering with ones that are hard work.
    One that I revert back to time and again is Watership Down, probably my favourite book of all time.
    Right now I'm reading Poor by Katriona O'Sullivan. It's gritty, sad and relatable for someone like me who was raised on a council housing estate.
    As for The Count of Monte Cristo, I've seen the film and it was really good. I'll await your review before I tackle the literary version though:)
    Here's the link to Poor, if anyone is interested: https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/452168/poor-by-osullivan-katriona/9780241996768

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Connor, I agree with you about the overuse of the word 'classic' although I'm choosing to read these books because they keep coming up or continue being referenced or studied decades/centuries after publication. I guess I'm hoping for an inspiring or educational reading experience and like you I'm often disappointed. I hated Frankenstein, Fahrenheit 451, Slaughter-House Five and The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath, although I don't regret the time spent reading them because I now understand the references and have an opinion. Classics can sometimes be a bit of a slog, but then I've discovered new favourites this way too, Stoner by John Williams and yes, Watership Down, loved that book! I abandoned Moby Dick too, but I'm hoping The Count of Monte Cristo will be a little more accessible. I haven't heard of Poor by Katriona O'Sullivan so I'm off to check it out, thanks for the link!

      Delete

Thanks for your comment, Carpe Librum!